Cash Back vs Low Interest
Manufacturers offer a rebate or a subsidised rate, rarely both. Compare the two properly: the rebate reduces the amount financed, the low rate reduces the interest, and the better deal depends on the term.
| Term | Cash back total | Low rate total |
|---|---|---|
| 36 mo | $39,194 | $39,123 |
| 48 mo | $40,621 | $39,492 |
| 60 mo | $42,080 | $39,864 |
| 72 mo | $43,571 | $40,237 |
| 84 mo | $45,095 | $40,613 |
finance = price − cash back · Interest at the standard rate.
finance = price · Interest at the subsidised rate.
A clear path from inputs to results.
Manufacturers offer a rebate or a subsidised rate, rarely both. Compare the two properly: the rebate reduces the amount financed, the low rate reduces the interest, and the better deal depends on the term.
How to use
- Set vehicle price ($).
- Set cash back ($).
- Set standard rate (%).
- Set subsidised rate (%).
- Read the headline metrics, then check the table for the detail.
The formula
Reference: Both offers compared over the same term and price as present values (Broverman, Mathematics of Investment and Credit).
Worked example
At the default inputs
- Vehicle price ($): 38000; Cash back ($): 3000; Standard rate (%): 7.5; Subsidised rate (%): 1.9; Term (months): 60
- 1
Better offer: Low rate · Total with rebate: $42,080 · Total with low rate: $39,864 · Difference: $2,216
Better offer: Low rate · Total with rebate: $42,080 · Total with low rate: $39,864
Interpreting the result
On a $38,000 vehicle over 60 months, the low rate offer is cheaper.
Assumptions & limitations
- Same term and price for both offers.
- No dealer fees or trade-in.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better?
A rebate wins on short terms, a subsidised rate on long ones — the crossover is the point.
Can I take both?
Rarely; manufacturers usually make them mutually exclusive.
Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-22. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.