Mat Foundation (Rigid Method)
Bearing pressure and punching shear for a rigid mat: P/A ± M/S at the corners, then the ACI two-way shear check at the column. A full finite-element mat with soil springs is a different model; this is the closed-form check that decides whether the mat is the right size.
| Corner | Pressure (kPa) |
|---|---|
| +x, +y | 110.8 |
| +x, −y | 104.2 |
| −x, +y | 95.8 |
| −x, −y | 89.2 |
A negative minimum means part of the mat is not in contact; the rigid method is then invalid.
q = P/A ± Mx/Sx ± My/Sy · Rigid-mat method, ACI 336.2R.
Sx = Lx·Ly²/6, Sy = Ly·Lx²/6 · For a rectangular plan.
φVc = 0.75·0.33·√f′c·b₀·d · ACI 318 §22.6.5.2, SI units.
A clear path from inputs to results.
Bearing pressure and punching shear for a rigid mat: P/A ± M/S at the corners, then the ACI two-way shear check at the column. A full finite-element mat with soil springs is a different model; this is the closed-form check that decides whether the mat is the right size.
How to use
- Set mat length lx (m).
- Set mat width ly (m).
- Set thickness (mm).
- Set total vertical load (kn).
- Read the headline metrics, then check the table for the detail.
The formula
Reference: ACI 336.2R rigid-mat method; ACI 318 §22.6 punching shear.
Worked example
At the default inputs
- Mat length Lx (m): 12; Mat width Ly (m): 10; Thickness (mm): 700; Total vertical load (kN): 12000; Moment about x (kN·m): 1500; Moment about y (kN·m): 800; Concrete f′c (MPa): 30; Allowable bearing (kPa): 200; Column size (mm): 500; Number of columns: 9
- 1
Average pressure → 100.0 Add the moments → 110.8 kPa Punching → 32%
Maximum bearing: 110.8 kPa · Minimum bearing: 89.2 kPa · Bearing utilisation: 55%
Interpreting the result
The 12.0 × 10.0 m mat carries 1.200e+4 kN at 110.8 kPa maximum bearing (55% of allowable) and 32% of the punching capacity.
Assumptions & limitations
- Rigid mat with a linear pressure distribution.
- No uplift; a negative minimum invalidates the method.
- Punching is checked per column at d/2.
Frequently asked questions
Is this a finite-element mat?
No. It is the rigid-mat closed form; a soil-spring FEM is a different model.
Why does the minimum pressure matter?
If it goes negative, part of the mat lifts off and P/A ± M/S no longer applies.
Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-23. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.