Skip to content

    Under active development. New calculators and features ship every week. Everything currently runs free while the site matures — pricing pages are a preview, checkout is not open yet.

    Calculates locally in your browser · capacitor bank sizing
    Power systems / power-factor correction

    Power-factor correction

    Size the capacitor bank that lifts a load from its present power factor to a target, and see the line current it saves. Real power never changes — only the reactive component the supply has to carry.

    PhasesThreeCurrent relief24.2%tan φ0.964 → 0.329
    Capacitor bank
    158.79 kVAr
    To move from 0.72 to 0.95
    Capacitance
    3159 µF/ph
    At 400 V, 50 Hz
    Line current
    379.8 A
    121.3 A lower than before
    Apparent power saved
    84.1 kVA
    Capacity released on the supply
    Correction bank sizing
    Reactive power before and after, the capacitor requirement, and the current relief.
    158.8 kVAr
    Correction bank sizing
    QuantityBeforeAfter
    Power factor0.7200.950
    Phase angle43.9°18.2°
    Apparent power347.2 kVA263.2 kVA
    Reactive power241.0 kVAr82.2 kVAr
    Line current501.2 A379.8 A
    Capacitor bank158.8 kVAr3159 µF per phase

    The bank supplies reactive power locally, so the utility no longer has to deliver it through the same cables — which is why line current falls without the real load changing.

    Inspect the model
    Choose a quick result view, a scaled comparison, or the complete diagnostic set.
    Power triangle, before and after
    Real power is unchanged; reactive and apparent power fall.
    Power triangle, before and after0.00081.94163.89245.83327.78409.72250.00P (kW)P (kW)240.96Q beforeQ before82.17Q afterQ after347.22S beforeS before263.16S afterS afterkVAr / kVA
    kVAr needed for each target pf
    Correction cost rises steeply as the target approaches unity.
    kVAr needed for each target pf0.00053.98107.95161.93215.90269.880.800.800.850.850.900.900.950.950.980.981.001.00kVAr
    Canonical equations
    The exact relationships implemented by this engine.

    Q = P·tan(acos pf) · per phase quantities scale identically

    Q_c = P(tan φ₁ − tan φ₂) · the classic correction formula

    C_ph = (Q_c/3)/(2πf·V_ph²) · three-phase: Q_c split equally across phases; V_ph = V_L/√3, so this equals Q_c/(2πf·V_L²)

    I = P/(√3·V_L·pf) · three-phase, line quantities

    engineering methodology

    A clear path from inputs to results.

    Correction capacitors supply reactive power locally, so the utility no longer has to deliver it through the same cables. Real power never changes — only the current that carries it, which is why correction releases capacity without touching the load.

    Step-by-step methodWorked exampleAssumptions explained

    How to use

    1. Enter the real power of the load.
    2. Set the present power factor and the target.
    3. Enter the supply voltage, frequency and phase count.
    4. Read the kVAr required and the capacitance per phase.
    5. Check the current relief and the apparent power released.

    The formula

    Qc=P(tan⁡φ1−tan⁡φ2),C=Qc2πfV2Q_c = P(\tan\varphi_1 - \tan\varphi_2), \qquad C = \frac{Q_c}{2\pi f V^2}

    Reference: IEEE 18 (shunt power capacitors); IEC 60831.

    Worked example

    250 kW at 0.72 corrected to 0.95 on a 400 V system

    Inputs
    • Real power 250 kW.
    • Power factor 0.72 → 0.95.
    • 400 V, 50 Hz, three phase.
    Calculation path
    1. 1

      Q before: 250 × tan(acos 0.72) = 240.9 kVAr.

    2. 2

      Q after: 250 × tan(acos 0.95) = 82.2 kVAr.

    3. 3

      Bank: 241.0 − 82.2 = 158.8 kVAr.

    4. 4

      Capacitance per phase: 158.8e3 / (3 × 2π × 50 × 230.9²) = 3,159 µF.

    5. 5

      Line current falls from 501 A to 380 A.

    Result

    158.8 kVAr bank · 3,159 µF per phase · line current down 121 A (24%).

    Interpreting the result

    The current reduction is where the money is: lower cable losses, released transformer capacity, and no utility penalty. But correction is a one-time capital cost against a permanent saving, so the payback depends on load hours and the tariff structure. Aim for 0.95–0.98, not unity — over-correction at light load gives a leading power factor, which some tariffs penalise too.

    Assumptions & limitations

    • A linear, sinusoidal load with no significant harmonic content.
    • The load runs at a steady power factor; varying loads need switched or automatic banks.
    • Voltage is constant and the capacitor is rated for it; capacitors on higher-voltage systems need series reactors.
    • No resonance study is performed, which is essential where variable-speed drives are present.

    Frequently asked questions

    Why not correct to unity power factor?

    Because the last few kVAr buy almost no current relief — the relationship is tangent-driven and flattens near unity — while risking a leading power factor at light load, which some utilities penalise.

    Can capacitors cause problems with drives?

    Yes. Capacitors and drive harmonics can resonate, amplifying harmonic voltages. Detuned reactors or active filters are required, and a harmonic study should precede the installation.

    What is the payback on correction?

    Typically one to three years for industrial loads running many hours. The saving comes from removed kVA demand charges, lower losses and avoided penalties.

    How do I size the capacitor for a single-phase load?

    Use the phase voltage in C = Q_c/(2πfV²) and set the phase count to one. The formula is the same; only the voltage basis changes.

    Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-18. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.