Traditional IRA: what is actually deductible
A traditional IRA is only worth more than a Roth if the deduction is real and the tax rate is lower at withdrawal. Above the phase-out the contribution is still allowed, but it is made with after-tax money inside an account that taxes the growth on the way out — which is the worst of both. This computes the deduction, the growth and the comparison.
| Step | Amount | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Contribution limit | $7,000 | under 50, no catch-up |
| Deductible portion | $0 | §219(g) phase-out, 0% allowed |
| Non-deductible portion | $7,000 | after-tax money inside a pre-tax wrapper |
| Tax saved now | $0 | 22% marginal rate |
| Balance at retirement | $37,992 | 25 years at 7.0% |
| Tax on withdrawal | $6,818 | 22% on the taxable part |
| After-tax value | $31,174 | what the household actually keeps |
| Same outlay in a Roth | $37,992 | funded with the after-tax equivalent |
| Difference | $6,818 | Roth ahead |
When the marginal rate is the same going in and coming out, the two accounts are identical — the deduction and the tax on withdrawal cancel exactly. The Roth wins when the rate is higher at retirement, which is the common case for someone in the 22% bracket today.
1 − (MAGI − start)/(end − start) · Linear phase-out, §219(g).
C × (1 + r)^n · Contribution compounded to retirement.
D·(1+r)^n + N·((1+r)^n − 1) · Deducted part plus growth on the rest.
C(1 − t_now)(1+r)^n · Funded with the same after-tax outlay.
A clear path from inputs to results.
A traditional IRA is only worth more than a Roth if the deduction is real and the tax rate is lower at withdrawal. Above the phase-out the contribution is still allowed, but it is made with after-tax money inside an account that taxes the growth on the way out.
How to use
- Enter your age, filing status and modified AGI.
- Say whether a workplace plan covers you or your spouse.
- Set the marginal rates today and at retirement.
- Read the deductible amount, the tax saved and the after-tax comparison.
The formula
Reference: IRC §219(b)(5) contribution limits and §219(g) deductibility phase-out, at the 2025 amounts.
Worked example
$7,000 contributed at $60,000 and at $100,000 of MAGI
- Age 40, single, covered by a workplace plan.
- Marginal rate 22% now and at retirement, 25 years, 7% growth.
- MAGI of $60,000, then $100,000.
- 1
At $60,000 the phase-out has not started, so the full $7,000 is deductible and saves $1,540 of tax.
- 2
The balance grows to $37,992 over 25 years.
- 3
The whole balance is taxable on withdrawal, leaving $29,634 after 22% tax.
- 4
A Roth funded with the same after-tax $5,460 also ends at $29,634 — identical, because the rates match.
- 5
At $100,000 nothing is deductible: the traditional ends at $31,174 after tax on the growth, and the Roth at $37,992.
- 6
The Roth advantage at that income is $6,818, which is exactly 22% of the growth.
$1,540 saved at $60,000 · identical outcome · $6,818 Roth advantage at $100,000.
Interpreting the result
The identity at equal rates is the thing to understand: a deduction now and tax later cancel exactly, so the traditional account is not a tax saving, it is a tax deferral. It only wins when the rate at withdrawal is lower, which is the usual case for someone in a high bracket today and a lower one in retirement.
Assumptions & limitations
- Contribution limit $7,000 plus $1,000 from age 50.
- Phase-out applies only when a workplace plan covers you for any part of the year.
- The non-deductible portion is recovered tax-free under the §72 basis rules; only its growth is taxed.
- State tax, the saver’s credit and Roth conversions are not modelled.
Frequently asked questions
Why is the Roth identical when the rates match?
Because the deduction is a deferral, not a gift. Taxing $7,000 at 22% now and the whole balance at 22% later gives the same after-tax result as taxing only the after-tax $5,460 now and nothing later.
Can I contribute to both a traditional and a Roth IRA?
Yes, but the $7,000 limit is shared between them, and the same limit applies across all your IRAs.
Is the deduction worth it if I am in the 12% bracket?
Usually not — the deferral is small and the flexibility of a Roth is worth more. The traditional deduction is most valuable at 22% and above.
What if I am not covered by a workplace plan?
Then the contribution is fully deductible at any income. The phase-out only exists because the deduction is meant to prevent double-dipping with an employer plan.
What happens if I contribute more than I can deduct?
The excess is a non-deductible contribution, which is allowed but requires Form 8606 and creates basis that has to be tracked for the rest of the account’s life.
Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-22. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.