Skip to content

    Under active development. New calculators and features ship every week. Everything currently runs free while the site matures — pricing pages are a preview, checkout is not open yet.

    Calculates locally in your browser · ACI 318 isolated footing
    Concrete / foundations

    Isolated footing design

    A footing is sized twice for two different reasons. The plan area comes from service load and allowable soil bearing — a geotechnical limit. The thickness comes from factored load and shear — a structural limit, and it is almost always punching shear that sets it. This iterates the depth until both checks pass, then designs the steel.

    Bearing2.83 ksfPunching92%One-way72%
    Footing size
    7.75 ft
    square, 60.1 ft²
    Thickness
    13 in
    effective depth 10 in, 3 in cover
    Governing shear
    Punching shear
    92% utilised
    Flexural steel
    #5 @ 10 in
    3.12 in² across the width
    Sizing and the two shear checks
    Plan area comes from service load and soil; thickness comes from factored load and shear.
    7.75 ft × 13 in
    Sizing and the two shear checks
    CheckDemandCapacity
    Service load160.0 kip—
    Factored load216.0 kip1.2D + 1.6L
    Footing self weight9.8 kip1.08 ft thick
    Gross bearing2.83 ksf3.00 ksf allowable
    Net pressure, qu3.60 ksffactored load over area
    One-way shear, Vu63.9 kip88.2 kip
    Punching shear, Vu196.4 kip212.5 kip
    Flexural moment136.1 kip·ftat the column face
    Steel required3.12 in²2.18 in² minimum
    Steel provided3.12 in²#5 @ 10 in
    Column bearing216.0 kip1432.1 kip

    Punching shear almost always sets the thickness. It is checked at d/2 from the column face on a perimeter of 4(c + d), and it falls off much faster with thickness than one-way shear does, so the two cross over as the load rises.

    Inspect the model
    Choose a quick result view, a scaled comparison, or the complete diagnostic set.
    Footing size against load
    Area is linear in load, so the side dimension grows as its square root.
    Footing size against load0.0002.745.498.2310.9813.7260 kip60 kip100 kip100 kip150 kip150 kip200 kip200 kip300 kip300 kip400 kip400 kipSide, ft
    Thickness against load
    Punching shear forces the thickness up in steps, because each inch changes the critical perimeter.
    Thickness against load0.0005.1910.3815.5820.7725.9613.0060 kip60 kip13.00100 kip100 kip13.00150 kip150 kip15.00200 kip200 kip19.00300 kip300 kip22.00400 kip400 kipThickness, in
    Canonical equations
    The exact relationships implemented by this engine.

    A = (P_service + W) / qa · Geotechnical limit.

    Vu = qu · B · (B/2 − c/2 − d) · φVc = 0.75 · 2√f’c · b · d.

    Vu = Pu − qu(c + d)² · φVc = 0.75 · 4√f’c · bo · d.

    Mu = qu · B · ((B − c)/2)² / 2 · Floored by 0.0018 b h.

    engineering methodology

    A clear path from inputs to results.

    A footing is sized twice for two different reasons. The plan area comes from service load and allowable soil bearing — a geotechnical limit. The thickness comes from factored load and shear — a structural limit, and it is almost always punching shear that sets it.

    Step-by-step methodWorked exampleAssumptions explained

    How to use

    1. Enter the column dead and live loads.
    2. Set the column size and the allowable soil bearing.
    3. Choose the concrete and steel strengths.
    4. Read the footing size, thickness, governing shear and steel callout.

    The formula

    A=1.1Pqa  ;  Vu=Pu−qu(c+d)2A = \frac{1.1P}{q_a} \;;\; V_u = P_u - q_u(c+d)^2

    Reference: ACI 318-19 for one-way shear (§22.5), two-way shear (§22.6), flexure and the shrinkage minimum; allowable bearing is a geotechnical input.

    Worked example

    160 kip on 3 ksf soil

    Inputs
    • 100 kip dead and 60 kip live on an 18-inch square column.
    • 3 ksf allowable bearing.
    • 4,000 psi concrete, Grade 60 steel.
    Calculation path
    1. 1

      The service load is 160 kip, so the required area is 176/3 = 58.7 ft² and the footing rounds to 7.75 ft square.

    2. 2

      The factored load is 1.2 × 100 + 1.6 × 60 = 216 kip, giving qu = 3.60 ksf.

    3. 3

      The depth is increased until both shear checks pass; punching governs at about 20 inches.

    4. 4

      Punching demand is Pu less the pressure inside the critical perimeter, against 0.75 × 4√f’c × bo × d.

    5. 5

      Flexural steel at the column face is floored by the 0.0018 shrinkage minimum.

    Result

    7.75 ft square · about 23 in thick · punching governs.

    Interpreting the result

    Punching shear almost always sets the thickness, and it falls off much faster with depth than one-way shear does, so the two cross over as the load rises. That is why a heavily loaded footing gets thicker rather than wider once the soil is fixed.

    Assumptions & limitations

    • A square, concentrically loaded footing on uniform soil.
    • Three inches of cover, cast against earth.
    • The punching capacity uses the simplified 4√f’c expression.
    • Uplift, moment, sliding and frost depth are not modelled.

    Frequently asked questions

    Why is the footing sized on service load but checked on factored load?

    Because bearing is a geotechnical limit expressed at working load, while shear and flexure are structural limits at ultimate. Mixing the two is the most common error.

    How thick should the footing be?

    Whatever makes both shear checks pass — usually 12 to 24 inches for ordinary loads. There is no point making it thicker than the shear requires.

    Why 3 inches of cover?

    Because the footing is cast directly against earth, so §20.5.1.3 requires 3 inches rather than the 2 inches used for formed surfaces.

    What if the column is rectangular?

    The critical perimeter becomes 2(c1 + d) + 2(c2 + d) and the β reduction in §22.6.5.2 starts to matter. This model assumes square.

    Do I need top steel?

    Not for a concentrically loaded footing on soil; the moment is at the bottom face. Top steel appears when there is uplift or a large moment.

    Methodology last reviewed 2026-10-22. Results are informational and not financial or engineering advice — see our disclaimer.